61.1 F
Seattle
Tuesday, April 21, 2026

A Housing ‘Black Tax’

 

Lee A. Daniels
Lee A. Daniels

If home ownership is, overwhelmingly, the foundation of individuals’ and  families’ economic security in America, Black Americans face a profoundly  difficult predicament. For when it comes to that signal marker, the wrenching  economic shocks of the past half-decade have wiped out at least 14 years of  Black Americans’ climb up the homeownership ladder.

That’s the inescapable assessment to be drawn from a series of recent reports  on discrimination in the home buying market, and on homes foreclosed on as a  result of the Great Recession.

These developments point to a  “perfect storm” of  individual,  institutional and structural racism that – along with such largely race-neutral  economic developments as the new surge of  all-cash deals for home  purchases in some metropolitan areas and the nation’s growing income inequality  – will undermine many Black Americans’ ability to become homeowners for years to  come.

- Advertisement -

That prediction is rooted in the stunning recent decline of Black  homeownership. From its peak of 49.1 percent in 2004, it fell to 44.9 percent in  2011 (compared to 46.9 percent for Latinos; nearly 59 percent for Asian  Americans; and more than 74 percent for Whites), according to diversitydata.org,  a research project of Brandeis University’s Institute for Child, Youth and  Family Policy. There’s every reason to think that since then it’s slipped below  its 1997 level of 44.8 percent.

What happened between then and now illustrates how powerfully the “Black tax”  – the greater economic and social cost the society’s ingrained racism forces  Black Americans to endure – has operated the housing sector.

The prosperity that marked the 1990s brought unprecedented job and wage gains  to Blacks along with other Americans. That, in turn, fueled steady rise of Black  homeownership.

But far too often the price many Blacks, Latino- and Asian Americans had to  pay for home loans was unjustifiably steep. During the last decade study after  study has shown that Black, Latino-, and Asian American homebuyers were forced  to accept subprime mortgages far more often than their White counterparts. Those  mortgages, which carry significantly higher interest rates and other costs than  conventional, prime mortgages, are typically for buyers with substandard credit  ratings. But the studies established that in many instances, banks and mortgage  lending institutions forced these loans – which reap higher fees for the lender  – on prospective home buyers of color despite their being qualified for  conventional mortgages.

- Advertisement -

One result of that, according to a new report by a national coalition of  community organizations and housing groups, was that when the Great Recession  hit, the housing bubble burst, and job layoffs mushroomed, many new Black and  Latino homeowners found themselves awash in debt and bereft of resources – and  thus, a target for foreclosure.

The report’s title, “Wasted Wealth: How the Wall Street Crash Continues to  Stall Economic Recovery and Deepen Racial Inequality in America,” underscores  its point that because Blacks and Latinos are far more likely than Whites to  have their home as their major source of wealth, these two groups have  experienced collective losses of billions of dollars of wealth and depressed  neighborhood property values.

In other words, more than a decade of effort to accumulate wealth has been  wasted – and a greater loss may be imminent because there remain millions of  homeowners who owe more on their mortgages than their homes are now worth.

It’s also likely the damage these developments have already wrought will be  compounded by the persistent racial or ethnic discrimination prospective  homebuyers of color face today.

Unlike the situation of decades ago, people of color seeking to buy homes  meet little overt discrimination: no doors slammed in their faces.

But the study the federal Department of Housing and Urban Development (HUD)  released earlier this month – which used White, Black, Latino, and  Asian-American “testers with the exact same financial credentials – found that  subtle discrimination in the housing market remains widespread.

The report, “Housing Discrimination Against Racial and Ethnic Minorities  2012,” was conducted by the Urban Institute, a Washington, D.C.-based think  tank.

Such tactics as realtors not showing prospective buyers of color the full  portfolio of homes in their price range, steering them to neighborhoods or  streets with predominantly minority populations, and not offering them the full  range of financial assistance are not only morally wrong, but continue the  economic penalty discrimination imposes on Blacks and other Americans of  color.

Both reports offer focused recommendations.

The HUD report urges closer government and private-sector scrutiny of housing  market practices in order to combat today’s more subtle forms of discrimination.   The “Wasted Wealth” study contends the key to solving the foreclosure  crisis lies in allowing owners of so-called underwater mortgages to write down,  or reset their current mortgages to 30-year, fixed rate loans.

The savings they would realize would have the added benefit of constituting a  de facto economic stimulus. But, first and foremost, adopting that approach  would establish a fire wall that could prevent billions more of the “wealth” of  America’s homeowners, especially its homeowners of color, from being  wasted.

 

 

Must Read

‘Big Tech Or Families?’ Parents Heading To Washington To Reignite Fight...

A coalition of parents and advocates is slated to arrive on Capitol Hill this week, intensifying their advocacy for federal online safety legislation, following two recent landmark jury verdicts that found social media companies liable for knowingly harming young individuals.