59.8 F
Seattle
Monday, June 22, 2026
Home Blog

The Long War Against Michelle Obama’s Womanhood

From birtherism of her husband, former President Barack Obama, to straight-up misogynoir, the latest controversy surrounding Michelle Obama highlights the enduring intersection of racism, gender, and political grievance in President Donald Trump's MAGAverse. Credit: Pablo Martinez Monsivais-Pool/Getty Images
From birtherism of her husband, former President Barack Obama, to straight-up misogynoir, the latest controversy surrounding Michelle Obama highlights the enduring intersection of racism, gender, and political grievance in President Donald Trump’s MAGAverse. Credit: Pablo Martinez Monsivais-Pool/Getty Images

by Joseph Williams

Most Americans have never heard of Josh Hokit, and probably couldn’t pick the failed pro football player-turned-UFC fighter out of a photo lineup.

But on Sunday night, after winning the biggest fight of his life on the White House lawn in front of President Donald Trump, Hokit decided that directing a line of tired, worn-out misogynoir at former First Lady Michelle Obama would extend his 15 minutes of MAGA fame. 

So, flush from victory in the ring, Hokit blathered into a mic during a post-fight interview that Michelle Obama is “a man” — resurrecting a bizarre, far-right conspiracy theory that also echoes one of the oldest tropes in the racism handbook. 

Welcome to the MAGAverse

What he said was nothing new; the bigoted lie about Michelle Obama dates to former President Barack Obama’s first run for the White House in 2008. Hokim’s outburst matters, though, because it happened on a prominent platform at the center of American power. 

Put another way: the problem isn’t that some meat-headed journeyman fighter insulted Black America’s forever first lady. The problem is that he felt free to do it with his whole chest, in front of the nation’s chief executive, on live TV, before millions of viewers. And his audience barely flinched. 

Outraged critics on the left have demanded that Trump condemn Hokit, though few of them are holding their breath. For nearly a decade, Trump has refused to apologize for offensive, racist rhetoric — particularly if it demeans his political opponents or revs up the MAGA base. 

Still, the incident begs a larger question: why, more than a decade after her family left the White House and she became a private citizen, has Michelle Obama remained a target of far-right attacks that question her womanhood, appearance, and humanity? 

Red-Pilled Blues

The answer lies at the intersection of political grievance, sexism, and good, old-fashioned racism

Analysts say white men like Hokit see changing demographics, shifting gender roles, and the rise of powerful women like Michelle Obama as evidence that America is leaving them behind. At the same time, Trump’s willingness to indulge them, by saying the quiet, racist part out loud, is the fuel that powers his political engine. 

Hokit’s attack on the former first lady felt less like a random, isolated outburst than a continuation of Trump’s long-running campaign of “othering” the nation’s first Black first family.

It helps explain why a tasteless insult from a second-rate MMA fighter — something that might otherwise have disappeared into the noise of social media — found an audience online. For red-pilled denizens of the manosphere, Hokit’s idiotic barb was a declaration of cultural allegiance at a time when white male resentment has become its own identity.

For the former first lady, however, the attack is nothing new. Since entering the public arena, activists on the right have described or depicted Michelle Obama as nearly every ugly racial stereotype — from an angry Black woman to a gorilla. But those attacks aren’t original, either; rather, they are merely updates to a very long history of white America diminishing and denigrating Black American women. 

‘A Disgrace’

Malcolm X once said, “The most disrespected person in America is the Black woman.” That statement played out in real time after Trump returned to power, when some 600,000 Black women — branded unqualified DEI hires, non-essential employees or both — lost their jobs, many of them during the White House’s Department of Government Efficiency purge last year. 

Moreover, the Hokit controversy erupted at perhaps the most symbolic venue imaginable: a UFC fight card staged to celebrate Trump’s 80th birthday and the upcoming  250th anniversary of American independence. The setting, and the occasion, symbolized how thoroughly Trump has blurred the lines between politics, white grievance, and entertainment spectacle. 

UFC fighter Josh Hokit / Getty Images

On social media, critics slammed Hokit, including former NFL star Robert Griffin III. He called the fighter’s statement “a disgrace. It takes a really small man to use his biggest moment to attack a woman by calling her a man.” 

Jemele Hill, a prominent Black sportswriter and author, used sarcasm to make her point: “Nothing says let’s celebrate America quite like that. Truly special.” Even UFC president Dana White — a staunch Trump ally and, to a degree, Hokit’s boss — said the fighter’s “nasty” remarks had no place in the sport.  

But Sen. Rafael Warnock, a Georgia Democrat who also presides over the historic Ebeneezer Baptist Church in Atlanta, got to the heart of the matter. Appearing on MSNow, Warnock said Michelle Obama’s accomplishments — including degrees from Harvard and Princeton and a successful legal career before entering the White House — are meaningless to Hokit and his supporters, who refuse to see Black people as fully human.

“This harkens to the darkest days of our country’s history,” he said. “This is not political speech. This is immoral speech. This is bigotry. This is evil come alive in words, because words have power.”

No Apologies

Meanwhile, Trump himself has repeatedly and unapologetically pushed ideas and rhetoric that have lived on the fringes of American political life. He launched his career attacking President Obama, pushing the racist “birther” conspiracy theory; over a decade, Trump has normalized insults and personal attacks that presidents of either party would have considered beneath the office. His boorishness, experts say, helped create a permission structure in which racist or sexist attacks that should be disqualifying are anything but.

Against that backdrop, Hokit’s verbal assault on the former first lady felt less like a random, isolated outburst than a continuation of Trump’s long-running campaign of “othering” the nation’s first Black first family. Still, it went beyond a crude attack by a no-name MMA fighter. 

Historians, Black feminist scholars, and media researchers have long documented how prominent Black women are subjected to remarks that question their femininity, portray them as angry or physically threatening, and cast them as somehow outside traditional (read: white) womanhood. It fits into the American tradition of policing Black women’s bodies, gender, and public visibility, dating back to slavery. But there’s a hidden, present-day danger.

When slandering Black women becomes routine, Black women stop being recognized as human. They become jokes, memes, talking points, and applause lines. Yet the persistence of those attacks says less about Michelle Obama than it does about a culture still struggling to accept powerful Black women on their own terms. 

Clearly, the nation’s first Black first lady — glamorous, accomplished and unapologetic — still lives, rent-free, in the minds of Trump and his MAGA supporters. As long as that’s the case, misogynoir against her, and against Black women in general, will never go out of style.

New Website Reveals A Deadly Truth For Black L.A. Communities

A new Los Angeles County dashboard offers a clearer look at the health impacts of extreme heat. Public health experts say the data could expose how heat disproportionately affects Black communities and how many heat-related deaths may be going uncounted. Credit: Getty Images
A new Los Angeles County dashboard offers a clearer look at the health impacts of extreme heat. Public health experts say the data could expose how heat disproportionately affects Black communities and how many heat-related deaths may be going uncounted. Credit: Getty Images

by Willy Blackmore

Every summer, as Southern California bakes under triple-digit heat, residents in historically Black, typically underserved neighborhoods like Watts, Compton, and Inglewood bear a disproportionate share of the suffering — and, too often, the dying — from temperatures that don’t fall when the sun goes down. 

Yet if an elderly Black resident in South Los Angeles dies alone in a sweltering apartment, the official death certificate may say kidney failure. It probably won’t say heat.

That’s about to change in Greater Los Angeles. Officials have unveiled a new way to track the most dangerous effects of heat: an online dashboard that shows how many people get sick or die from extreme heat.

Dangerous Heatwaves

The LA County Department of Public Health developed the Heat-Related Illness and Mortality Dashboard to track illnesses and deaths from heat exposure. The site, which launched earlier this month, will help the health department, its partners, and communities better understand the health consequences of extreme heat. 

The new dashboard will give a snapshot sense of how heatwaves are affecting public health across the vast county. 

This dashboard gives us timely, local insight into who is most affected and where, helping [LA County] Public Health and our partners take targeted action.

Barbara Ferrer, LA County Department of Public Health

Barbara Ferrer, the department’s director, said in a press release that the dashboard can help prevent deaths among vulnerable residents. 

“Extreme heat is becoming more frequent and severe, making heat-related illness an increasing concern, especially for older adults, young children, outdoor workers, and people with underlying health conditions,” she said. “This dashboard gives us timely, local insight into who is most affected and where, helping Public Health and our partners take targeted action.” 

Undercounting Heat Deaths

Officials say the dashboard will feature heat-related emergency room visits and deaths by month, along with race and other demographic information. But the mortality rate will be based on death certificates. 

That could be a concern: although it’s been widely established that heat can be fatal, deaths during heatwaves are often attributed to other causes, such as cardiac arrest, despite the fact that extreme heat events can trigger or exacerbate underlying health conditions.

Loa Angeles County Department of Public Health Heat Dashboard (Credit: LA County Dept. of Public Health screenshot)

In an interview with Governing magazine, Dr. Bharat Venkat, director of the UCLA Heat Lab, explained that relying on death certificate data risks undercounting heat-related mortality. 

“Heat piggybacks off of preexisting health conditions,” Venkat said. “Say you go to the ER and you’re experiencing an intense psychotic episode, or a heart attack or a stroke. It’s very likely that the doctor is going to diagnose that as a psychotic episode, heart attack or stroke, and less likely that they’ll note that heat is contributing to that.”

Even though the Los Angeles area consistently records high summer temperatures, there hasn’t been much research on the effects of extreme heat on the nearly 10 million people who live there. But it’s clear that Black people and communities are especially at risk for heat fatalities.

Risk Disparities

Decades of underinvestment in Black neighborhoods, fomented by redlining, have resulted in a lack of cooling green spaces with tree canopies and an abundance of heat-absorbing surfaces such as asphalt. 

A 2024 study in the journal Public Health, which analyzed weather and mortality data, found that about 200 people die annually from extreme heat. Most are among the area’s most vulnerable populations, including the unhoused; in metro Los Angeles, about a third of the homeless population is Black. 

By comparison, Los Angeles County’s Black population sits at around 8%. 

During the city’s so-called heat season, which runs from May through October, the dashboard will track heat-related emergency-room visits alongside the day’s high temperature in downtown LA. Having an immediate sense of how heat is affecting residents, Ferrer said, will make it easier to respond quickly.

Finding Fellowship: How A Black Maryland Community Bridged Racial Divides

As historic Black communities face displacement from development and demographic change, the work of Jacob Green — a memoirist, documentary filmmaker, and former Obama staffer — pays tribute to the past and offers a warning about what is lost when history is forgotten. Credit: Jacob Green/Photo Illustration
As historic Black communities face displacement from development and demographic change, the work of Jacob Green — a memoirist, documentary filmmaker, and former Obama staffer — pays tribute to the past and offers a warning about what is lost when history is forgotten. Credit: Jacob Green/Photo Illustration

by Rev. Dorothy S. Boulware

Jason Green thought he was returning home to say goodbye to his grandmother.

Instead, sitting beside Ida Pearl Green’s bed in a Montgomery County, Maryland, nursing facility, the former White House aide to President Barack Obama found himself listening to stories about a Black church, two white congregations, and an unlikely 1968 experiment in fellowship that survived one of the most turbulent periods in American history. 

Those conversations would eventually become “Finding Fellowship,” a PBS documentary that asks what a bitterly divided nation in the era of President Donald Trump might learn from communities that chose reconciliation over retreat.

Green calls the documentary “a microcosm of America” and how a community moved past division and embraced “what can be accomplished with intention, purpose, and sacrifice.” It tells the story of how the churches in a historically Black community in Maryland set aside division and suspicion to unite in the aftermath of the King assassination — and how the Black church is the only one still standing. 

Historic Black Community

His grandmother is also the catalyst for Green’s new book, “Too Precious to Lose,” about how Quince Orchard, a historically Black community in Maryland that’s not far from Washington, D.C., is in danger of being wiped out by suburban development and the ravages of time. 

While the central story of his film emphasizes unity, the story “is also about demonstrating the importance of intentionally preserving our history and heritage,” says Green, a preacher’s kid who once considered entering the ministry. “Our film is raising awareness of that Pleasant View [Maryland] historic site and raising the funds to ensure it is saved and preserved to be a site for inspiration for generations to come.”

On its website, the Pleasant View Historical Association describes the community as the social hub of Quince Orchard, a once-rural community in danger of being overtaken by homes and shopping centers. It’s home to Pleasant View United Methodist Church, the Quince Orchard Colored School, and Pleasant View Cemetery. 

Accidental Historian

In some ways, Green was hardly a likely chronicler of Pleasant View’s history. 

A Yale-trained lawyer who worked on Obama’s presidential campaign and later served in the White House, Green had built a career worlds away from the community that shaped his family. For years, career opportunities and public service had pulled him farther from it.

“I was kind of marching down this world feeling like I had it figured out,” Green said. “I was on this journey of self-importance.”

There are important lessons from our past that can help us navigate where we’re trying to go.

Jacob GReen, Author and documentary filmmaker

 Then came the call from his mother in 2013: Ida Pearl Green, who had shaped his earliest understanding of faith, service, and community, was nearing the end of her life.

Green’s grandmother was born in 1918 and reared in Quince Orchard. Active well into her 100th year, Ida Pearl Green embodied a generation forged by hard work, faith, and perseverance. 

‘Here to Serve Someone’

When he was a boy, Ida Pearl Green had taken her grandson on volunteer visits to nursing-home residents. When he asked why they spent time with people they could not help, she offered a lesson he took to heart: “We’re not here to save someone. We’re here to serve someone.”

That lesson “allowed me, even at five years old, to understand that I could make someone’s life better simply by showing up and being present,” Green told Word In Black in a recent interview.

After receiving the call about his grandmother, Green quickly arrived at her bedside, carrying guilt over the years he had missed with her. Long conversations with her, however, would become the foundation for “Too Precious to Lose.” 

As he spent time with her, stories began to emerge that he had never fully heard before. She told him about growing up in Quince Orchard, a close-knit Black farming community anchored by faith, education, and mutual support. She described a world where Black churches, teachers, and neighbors formed a protective network that nurtured generations.

Green found himself longing for the community she described, which thrived despite existing beneath the shadow of Jim Crow.

“I kept thinking, ‘Wait a minute. How did y’all have this Black solidarity community?’” he said.

Faith and Fellowship

Her stories also revealed a remarkable chapter in local civil rights history. Green learned how his family’s historic Black church, faced with declining enrollment and aging facilities, elected to merge with two white congregations facing similar challenges. The vote happened just after King’s assassination, launching years of difficult conversations about race, identity, and shared community.

Green was stunned. The story challenged his assumptions about community and reconciliation, eventually inspiring him to leave the White House and begin working on “Finding Fellowship.” 

On his final day with the administration, Green brought his grandmother to meet Obama in the Oval Office. Neither she nor the president knew Green planned to resign. The choice would become one of the most meaningful decisions of his life.

As he dove into research and Trump rose to political prominence, “I remember hearing that the country hadn’t been this divided ‘since 1968,’” Green said in an interview published on the Obama Foundation website. “My grandmother had told me this story from 1968 about people overcoming their division, and I thought perhaps this was a story that could help us as we try to figure out how we’re going to move forward into the future.”

Important Lessons

Doctors initially predicted Ida Pearl Green, then in her mid-90s, she had only months to live. Instead, she lived nearly 11 more years, dying just shy of her 107th birthday. Those years back home, away from the demands of Washington, gave Jason Green time to preserve family stories, document community history, and deepen relationships that might otherwise have been lost.

Today, he sees those stories as more than family memories. He believes they offer guidance for a nation wrestling with division, uncertainty, and isolation.

“We’ve been here before,” Green said. “There are important lessons from our past that can help us navigate where we’re trying to go.”

The Algorithm May Not See You

While use of mental health chatbots increases, artificial intelligence may be worsening many of the racial disparities it was promised to fix. (Credit: Jaque Silva/NurPhoto / Getty Images)
While use of mental health chatbots increases, artificial intelligence may be worsening many of the racial disparities it was promised to fix. (Credit: Jaque Silva/NurPhoto / Getty Images)

by Jennifer Porter Gore

For millions of Americans struggling to afford health care, a new source of medical advice is only a few keystrokes away.

As use of AI tools like ChatGPT, Claude, Google Gemini and others become more widespread, national surveys suggest that uninsured people — particularly Black Americans and young adults — are among the groups most likely to use them for physical health information and mental health guidance. 

Some users appear to be turning to AI because they can’t afford a doctor’s visit, can’t schedule an appointment, or lack a regular health care provider. While instant, free advice is hard to resist, researchers and patient advocates warn that AI can produce inaccurate, misleading, or potentially dangerous recommendations. 

The stakes are even higher for Black patients: researchers have consistently found that chatbots often echo racial biases, generalizations and stereotypes. Using one for medical advice, experts say, could reproduce the same problems that plague Black Americans in healthcare spaces. 

Higher Use Among the Young and the Uninsured

A new study, published in JAMA Pediatrics earlier this month, illustrates the trend. It found that Black youth are around five times more likely than white youth to seek mental health advice from a chatbot at least once a month. This seems to be a snapshot of a larger trend: Black and Hispanic adults are also more likely to use AI for mental health information compared to white adults and people who have health insurance, according to KFF Health poll results published in March.

The findings come amid what is widely seen as a mental health crisis among Black people, including suicide rates that have risen sharply over the last two decades.

Kamal Grewal, a health technology entrepreneur, also worries that an AI therapist can give a young person in crisis the illusion of support, even though it potentially does more harm than good.  Several major AI companies, including OpenAI and Google, are fighting lawsuits alleging their chatbots contributed to or encouraged user suicides. 

“Consumer AI tools are optimized to keep users engaged: they validate, they agree, they make you feel heard,” says Grewal, creator of Therapy Companion, an AI tool designed to help therapists with non-patient services. “That’s great for retention metrics, but dangerous for someone in a mental health crisis, where what you need isn’t validation but a trained clinician who can challenge your thinking and hold you accountable,” 

It’s no surprise that AI use is higher among younger people and is gaining traction among adults. 

In fact, roughly 1 in 3 adults responding to a nationwide poll said they used AI chatbots last year to get health information. Of those who said they used AI for health information, one-third were looking for advice about physical health matters and just over 15% searched for mental health advice. 

Most respondents to the poll said they were looking for immediate advice. But there are indications that problems affording or finding health care also played a role for a slice of the respondents, especially for younger adults.

The RAND study published in JAMA estimates that roughly 8.2 million young people nationwide reported using artificial intelligence for mental health advice this year, an increase of 40% compared to last year. That’s a major jump from the findings of a similar RAND survey conducted a year earlier.

The study sampled 1009 youth, of whom 95 were Black. But the study’s authors noted the sample size for this analysis was small, and the issue needs more investigation. Nevertheless, when it came to using AI chatbots for mental health advice, Black youth were over five times more likely than white youth to seek advice at least once a month.

The RAND study finds that among youth who asked AI chatbots for mental health advice, 42.8% did so at least once a month and a whopping 91.7% said the advice ranged from “somewhat” to “very” helpful. Equally noteworthy: more than 2 of 3 adolescents said they hadn’t told anyone they used AI chatbots for mental health support. 

Chatbots used include ChatGPT, Gemini, Character.AI, and Meta AI. Young people tended to consult them when they felt angry, nervous, sad, or stressed.

Bias Hidden in the Code

landmark 2024 study published in Nature magazine found that when large language models were given prompts written in African American English, they produced stereotypes as negative as — or worse than — those recorded from humans during the Jim Crow era, without the users’ race even being mentioned. 

The AI assigned the AAE speakers’ information for lower-prestige jobs, convicted them more often in hypothetical criminal cases, and more frequently recommended the death penalty when that punishment was an option.

Sharese King, assistant professor of Linguistics at the University of Chicago, said the data did not make her optimistic. 

“If we continue to ignore the field of AI as a space where racism can emerge, then we’ll continue to perpetuate the stereotypes and the harms against African Americans, ” she said.

The implications for teen mental health are serious since a large number of Black youth communicate in some form of AAE. If the chatbot they’re trusting to advise them about their depression, anxiety, or a crisis is unknowingly penalizing them because of how they speak, the “help” being offered could be biased against them.

Among Black youth, the use of AI to support mental health breaks along gender lines. 

Black teenage girls are more likely to use a chatbot to deal with anxiety, depression, and relationship stress. By comparison, Black teenage boys face stronger cultural pressure against vulnerability and are less likely to disclose if they use AI. But researchers say when they do turn to a chatbot, they are often already in acute distress.

Grewal of Therapy Companion says the overreliance on AI for mental health is a worrisome sign among Black people in general. 

“Black adults are already turning to these tools at nearly double the rate of white adults, which means the people most underserved by the mental health system are also the most exposed to AI that isn’t built to help them,” he says.

Americans View Obama Far More Positively Than Trump Or Biden, CNN Poll Finds

Former President Barack Obama speaks during the Democratic National Convention Tuesday, Aug. 20, 2024, in Chicago. (Robert Gauthier/Los Angeles Times/Getty Images via CNN Newsource)
Former President Barack Obama speaks during the Democratic National Convention Tuesday, Aug. 20, 2024, in Chicago. (Robert Gauthier/Los Angeles Times/Getty Images via CNN Newsource)

By Ariel Edwards-Levy, CNN

(CNN) — As Barack Obama opens his presidential center, he does so as by far the most popular living president.

Obama is viewed positively by 57% of Americans, a new CNN poll conducted by SSRS finds, far surpassing the ratings for his two Oval Office successors. Only 34% of the public offers a favorable opinion of President Donald Trump, with former President Joe Biden’s favorability trailing at just 30%.

Obama’s standing among political independents is more than twice as high as either Biden’s or Trump’s. Unlike Biden or Trump, he also has the near-universal backing of his own party.

And though only about one-fifth of Republicans take a positive view of Obama, that’s still far above the share of Americans willing to cross party lines in support of his successors.

Other members of the presidents’ club see their ratings fall somewhere between Obama on the one side and Biden and Trump on the other. Views of George W. Bush tilt narrowly positive, 42% favorable to 33% unfavorable, while opinions of Bill Clinton are about equally split.

Views of former presidents often change retrospectively, and in many cases improve. Bush, who left the White House with deeply negative ratings, saw his image markedly improve in the following decades. And Trump, who ended his first term with just 33% of Americans rating him positively in CNN’s polling, saw his rating climb to 46% just before he was inaugurated for the second time – after which his rating promptly began another decline.

Obama, who saw mixed ratings during much of his second term, has maintained broad popularity in the years since leaving office.

By contrast, Biden — who took office with a 59% favorability rating and left it at 33% — now sees a favorability rating that’s lower than it was at any point during his presidency. The share rating him unfavorably is also down from its peak, with a growing minority instead offering no opinion.

Clinton has also seen a more unfavorable reassessment over the past decade.

The poll highlights a generational shift in Americans’ historical memory: An increasing share of the public came of age politically in the Trumpian era of politics, with little or no memory of the presidents before Obama. More than 4 in 10 adults younger than 30 say they don’t have any opinion of Bush or Clinton, respectively. (Surveys conducted over the past five years, unlike earlier polls, also gave respondents an explicit option to say they’d heard of somebody but didn’t have an opinion of them.)

Which president in US history does the public most admire?

Asked in an open-ended question which president they most admire, Americans largely favored relatively recent names: 30% name Obama, 19% Trump, 9% Abraham Lincoln, 9% Ronald Reagan, 6% John F. Kennedy, and 5% George Washington.

Other living presidents were named less frequently: 2% picked Clinton, and 1% each named Biden and George W. Bush. (An additional 1% named “Bush,” but didn’t specify which president.) Nearly 10% said they didn’t admire any of the presidents or offered no opinion.

Nearly two-thirds of Democrats, 64% say they most admired Obama, with 6% naming Kennedy, 5% Lincoln and 5% Franklin Delano Roosevelt. Among Republicans, Trump holds the most-admired title with a smaller 53% majority, followed by Reagan at 18%, Lincoln at 8%, and Kennedy and Washington at 5% each.

The-CNN-Wire
™ & © 2026 Cable News Network, Inc., a Warner Bros. Discovery Company. All rights reserved.

Voting Begins For The Seattle Medium’s Best Of The Best Northwest Readers’ Choice Awards, Nominees Announced

The Seattle Medium has announced the official nominees for its inaugural Best of the Best Northwest Readers’ Choice Awards, with community voting opening June 1 and continuing through June 19, 2026. 

The awards program recognizes outstanding businesses, nonprofits, community leaders, educators, athletes, advocates and cultural institutions throughout the Pacific Northwest. Nominees were selected through a public nomination process that generated submissions from readers across the region. 

“The response from the community has been tremendous,” said Chris B. Bennett, publisher and CEO of The Seattle Medium. “These awards were created to celebrate the individuals, businesses and organizations that are making a positive impact in our communities every day. We encourage everyone to participate in the voting process and help recognize those who are helping move our communities forward.” 

The Best of the Best Northwest Readers’ Choice Awards feature nominees in eight major categories: Community Leadership, Youth & Education, Coaches & Athletics, Business & Enterprise, Non-Profits & Community Impact, Food & Dining, Personal Care & Wellness and Black Beverage Makers. 

Nominees include elected officials, community advocates, nonprofit organizations, educators, coaches, entrepreneurs, restaurants, cultural institutions and youth-serving organizations from throughout the Pacific Northwest. 

Among this year’s nominees are respected community organizations such as the Urban League of Metropolitan Seattle, Freedom Project, Atlantic Street Center, Tubman Center for Health & Freedom, Central Area Youth Association, Byrd Barr Place and Africatown. Individual nominees include Seattle City Councilmember Joy Hollingsworth, King County Executive Girmay Zahilay, State Sen. T’wina Nobles, State Rep. Jamila Taylor, Attorney General Nick Brown and numerous community advocates, educators, entrepreneurs and nonprofit leaders. 

The awards were created to celebrate excellence while increasing visibility for the businesses, organizations and individuals who continue to strengthen communities throughout the Pacific Northwest. 

Voting will take place online from June 1 through June 19, 2026, at BestoftheBestNorthwest.com. Winners will be determined by reader votes and recognized in a special Best of the Best Northwest publication and across The Seattle Medium’s digital platforms. 

The complete list of official nominees appears below. 

HOW TO VOTE 

Voting Period: June 1–19, 2026 

Vote Online: BestoftheBestNorthwest.com 

View all nominees: seattlemedium.com/seattle-medium-best-of-voting-nominees-list/

Winners will be announced in a special Best of the Best Northwest section published by The Seattle Medium. 

Black Representation: 1776–2026. 250 Years of Leadership, Citizenship, And Black Civic Engagement

By State Rep. Debra Entenman

Remember where we started.

Juneteenth is more than a date on a calendar. It is the day the promise of freedom finally reached those who had been denied it. It is a reminder that liberty delayed is still liberty denied, and that citizenship means little if it cannot be exercised. As we commemorate Juneteenth in 2026, we do so at the intersection of two anniversaries: the celebration of Black freedom and the 250th anniversary of a nation founded in 1776 on ideals that did not yet include all of its people.

For Black Americans, the distance between 1776 and Juneteenth tells a story all its own.

It is the story of a people who believed freedom was their birthright and who challenged America to become what it claimed to be.

It is the story of a people who built this nation, defended this nation, and challenged this nation to become better than it was.

And it is the story of a people whose sacrifices demand more from us than remembrance.

They demand participation.

They demand leadership.

They demand action.

Recognize that every right we possess was purchased by someone’s courage. From abolitionists and educators to soldiers and organizers, generations of Black Americans invested their labor, their voices, and sometimes their lives to move this

nation forward. The greatest tribute we can offer them is not applause for their achievements but action in our own time. Register. Vote. Participate.

Understand that representation has never been given freely. It has always been earned through persistence, civic engagement, and collective action. During Reconstruction, Black Americans entered public office and helped reshape the nation. Those gains were challenged and often reversed, but the determination to participate never disappeared. Our responsibility is to continue building where they were forced to rebuild. Show up. Organize. Stay engaged.

Remember that voter suppression has taken many forms throughout American history. Sometimes it appeared through laws, sometimes through intimidation, and sometimes through attempts to convince people that their vote does not matter. The lesson of history is clear: when people stop participating, others make decisions for them. Protect your voice by using it. Vote in every election, not just presidential elections.

Recognize the power of local leadership. School boards, city councils, county commissions, state legislatures, and Congress all shape daily life. Black civic engagement has always extended beyond national headlines. Communities are strengthened when citizens remain informed and involved. Learn the issues. Know the candidates. Hold leaders accountable.

Honor the legacy of the Civil Rights Movement by understanding what was truly won. The struggle was never simply about access; it was about influence. It was about ensuring that every citizen could help shape the future of the country. Rights become strongest when exercised. Use them. Defend them. Pass them on.

Remember that Black representation is not merely about who occupies a seat. It is about ensuring that communities have a voice in decisions that affect their futures. The election of Black leaders at every level of government reflects generations of sacrifice and determination. That progress must never be taken for granted. Support civic participation. Encourage others to vote. Build the next generation of leaders.

Recognize that democracy is not self-sustaining. Every generation inherits both opportunities and obligations. The freedoms we enjoy today survived because previous generations refused to remain silent. Their example calls us to become active citizens rather than passive observers. Participate consistently. Speak constructively. Lead courageously.

As America marks its 250th anniversary in 2026, we celebrate not only the nation’s history but also the enduring contributions of Black Americans to its democratic life. From 1776 to today, the story of Black civic engagement has been a story of perseverance, faith, and action. Our ancestors opened doors that many believed would remain closed forever.

The question before us is simple: What will we do with the inheritance they left behind?

The answer must be action.

Vote because they could not.

Vote because they fought to.

Vote because representation matters.

Vote because democracy requires participation.

Vote because history demands remembrance.

Vote because the future demands stewardship.

And vote because the surest way to honor our ancestors is not merely to celebrate their victories, but to continue their work.

America At 250: Patriotism Without Truth Is Propaganda

by Julianne Malveaux

(Trice Edney Wire) – I have never been much for flag-waving patriotism. I respect the rituals, and I understand why some people are moved by them. But my own relationship with patriotism has always been complicated, even chilly. It is difficult to be sentimental about a nation that enslaved my ancestors, exploited their labor, denied them citizenship, terrorized them for seeking freedom, and then asked their descendants to celebrate as if history were a parade instead of a wound.

I do not even pledge allegiance easily. Allegiance to what? To two nations, one Black and one white, under whose God, divisible, with justice for some? We are asked to place hands over hearts and recite words that have never fully described this country. “The land of the free and the home of the brave” too often reads, in Black history, like the land of the thief and the home of the enslaved. That is not cynicism. It is memory.

As America prepares to celebrate its 250th anniversary, we are sure to see fireworks, pageantry, speeches, flags, concerts, and carefully choreographed displays of national pride. There will be much talk about freedom, democracy, courage, and sacrifice. There will be less talk about enslavement, Indigenous dispossession, racial terror, women’s exclusion, immigrant exploitation, and the centuries-long struggle required to force this country to honor even a portion of its promises.

That is the problem with patriotic spectacle. It too often asks us to celebrate the promise while ignoring the breach.

The Declaration of Independence declared that “all men are created equal” in 1776, even as enslaved people were bought, sold, whipped, raped, and worked without wages. The Constitution protected slavery. Black people built wealth they were forbidden to own. Women were excluded from the franchise. Native people were pushed from their land. And still, generation after generation, people denied the full benefits of citizenship fought to expand the meaning of democracy.

That is the America I honor — not the myth, but the struggle.

Black people have never had the luxury of simple patriotism. We have loved a country that did not love us back. We have served in its wars, built its institutions, paid its taxes, raised its children, enriched its culture, and strengthened its democracy. Yet we have had to fight for every inch of recognition and every fragment of justice.

Consider the Black soldiers who fought for democracy abroad and came home to racial terror at home. Some returned from World War I wearing the uniform of the United States Army, only to be beaten, humiliated, or lynched by white mobs who understood that the uniform represented a claim to manhood, dignity, and citizenship. Their service did not protect them. Their patriotism did not save them. Their sacrifice did not guarantee their safety.

That history must be part of America’s 250th anniversary.

So must the history of Black women who marched, organized, taught, prayed, strategized, resisted, and voted this nation toward a more honest democracy. Black women were pushed to the back of suffrage marches, erased from civic narratives, and expected to serve movements that did not always serve us. Still, we persisted. Still, we organized. Still, we claimed space.

Delta Sigma Theta Sorority, then newly founded, marched in the 1913 Woman Suffrage Procession in Washington, D.C. Black women understood that the vote was not a gift. It was a weapon, a shield, and a demand. Even after the Nineteenth Amendment, Black women in the South were blocked by racist laws and white violence. The right existed on paper before it existed in practice.

That too is America.

Frederick Douglass asked in 1852, “What to the Slave Is the Fourth of July?” His question still echoes because the contradiction still echoes. How does a nation celebrate liberty while denying it? How does a nation praise democracy while suppressing votes? How does a nation honor veterans while abandoning them? How does a nation speak of freedom while banning books, distorting history, and punishing truth-tellers?

America’s 250th anniversary could be an opportunity. It could invite us into a deeper, more mature patriotism — one rooted not in denial, but in honesty. A patriotism that does not require amnesia. A patriotism that understands critique as care. A patriotism that knows telling the truth about America is not the same as hating America.

But that will not happen if we allow the commemoration to become one more exercise in mythmaking.

We have already seen the direction of travel. A cage fight on the White House lawn, wrapped in patriotic branding and corporate spectacle, is not a celebration of democracy. It is the denouement of ritual — the hollowing out of civic meaning until the symbols remain but the substance is gone. When the people’s house becomes an arena, when national commemoration becomes marketing, when patriotism is staged as combat, we should not pretend this is harmless entertainment. It is a sign of civic decay.

We do not need a birthday party built on erasure. We need a reckoning. We need to ask who built this country, who benefited, who was excluded, who resisted, and who is still owed. We need to ask why the racial wealth gap persists, why voting rights remain under attack, why Black women are still demeaned in public life, why schools are being pressured to silence history, and why reparations are treated as radical when theft is treated as tradition.

At 250, America should be old enough to stop lying about itself.

Let there be fireworks if there must be. Let there be speeches and ceremonies. But let there also be memory, humility, and an accounting.

Patriotism without truth is propaganda. Celebration without reckoning is evasion. And a nation that refuses to remember honestly cannot be trusted to move forward justly.

—————-

Dr. julianne alveaux is a DC based economist and author.  juliannemalveaux.com; malveauxnewsletter@gmail.com

From Access To Ownership: The Evolving Fight For Equity In Seattle

Africatown Plaza in Seattle’s Central area. Staff Photo/Aaron Allen

By Aaron Allen, The Seattle Medium

For decades, civil rights advocacy focused on access.

Access to housing.

Access to jobs.

Access to education.

Access to political power.

But a growing number of Black leaders in Seattle are asking a different question:

Who owns the land?

The answer, they argue, will determine whether future generations have a lasting stake in the city’s future.

As Seattle continues to grow and redevelop, community advocates are increasingly embracing a framework known as spatial justice, the belief that ownership of land, housing and community assets is fundamental to achieving lasting equity.

For these leaders, the issue is no longer simply whether Black residents are included in Seattle’s future.

The question is whether they will own a meaningful stake in it and share in its long-term prosperity.

Advocates of spatial justice argue that representation alone cannot create lasting equity. A community may be represented in government, celebrated for its cultural contributions or included in conversations about growth and development. But without ownership of land, businesses and community institutions, many leaders believe those gains remain vulnerable to forces beyond the community’s control.

Ownership, they argue, provides something different: permanence. It creates opportunities to build wealth, influence development decisions and ensure that future generations benefit from the value their communities help create.

“Spatial justice means we must have a stake in the land,” said K. Wyking Garrett, president and CEO of Africatown Community Land Trust. “Reclaiming our physical footprint is the only way to ensure our community’s future in the city we helped build.”

That philosophy has become the foundation for a growing movement focused on transforming cultural preservation into economic permanence.

For generations, many civil rights victories focused on securing access to institutions that had historically excluded Black Americans. Today, advocates of spatial justice argue that access alone is insufficient if communities lack ownership.

Without ownership, they contend, communities remain vulnerable to market forces, redevelopment pressures and economic displacement. The result is a growing focus on acquiring and controlling physical assets that can provide long-term stability, wealth creation and community influence.

Organizations such as Africatown Community Land Trust have emerged as leading examples of that strategy.

The Liberty Bank Building and Africatown Plaza represent more than housing developments.

They represent ownership.

For advocates of spatial justice, projects such as the Liberty Bank Building and Africatown Plaza are not simply real estate developments. They are examples of communities moving from participation to ownership.

The distinction matters. Communities often help create the culture, identity and economic vitality that make neighborhoods desirable. Yet without ownership of land and assets, they can find themselves excluded from the prosperity that follows.

Located in Seattle’s Central District, both projects were designed to create opportunities for Black residents, entrepreneurs and families to maintain a lasting presence in a neighborhood that has undergone dramatic change. The Liberty Bank Building sits on the site of the Pacific Northwest’s first Black-owned bank and combines affordable housing with commercial space. Africatown Plaza provides affordable housing and opportunities for Black-owned businesses while reinforcing a long-term community presence in one of Seattle’s most historically significant neighborhoods.

For advocates of spatial justice, these projects demonstrate what happens when communities move beyond reacting to development and begin shaping it.

Knowing that culture creates economic value is only part of the equation, Garrett and other advocates argue. The more important question is who benefits from that value. If communities help create a neighborhood’s cultural identity but do not own the underlying assets, they risk being displaced from the prosperity they helped generate.

The fight for ownership extends beyond large-scale developments. It also includes helping families retain the homes and assets they already possess.

Organizations such as Wa Na Wari have adopted that approach by combining arts programming with estate planning assistance and homeowner support services designed to help families preserve generational wealth. Operating from a fifth-generation Black-owned home in Seattle’s Central District, the organization views homeownership not simply as a housing issue, but as a tool for long-term economic security.

The home itself stands as one of the increasingly rare examples of multigenerational Black property ownership in a neighborhood where many longtime families have been priced out or displaced. For advocates, preserving those assets is essential to preserving pathways to wealth and opportunity for future generations.

“We are using Black radical imagination to look at a house not just as real estate, but as a site of cultural sovereignty,” organizers at Wa Na Wari have noted. “By anchoring Black art in a physical, community-owned home, we create an economic and cultural sanctuary.”

For advocates, protecting family-owned property is one of the most direct ways to prevent displacement from continuing across generations.

Spatial justice is often discussed in terms of land and development, but advocates say ownership of history is equally important.

The Black Heritage Society of Washington State has made that work central to its mission by preserving oral histories, photographs, archives and community records that document the experiences of Black Washingtonians.

“As we go about our mission at the Black Heritage Society of Washington State to preserve and uplift Black history and legacies, we find ourselves immersed in the knowledge of Black experiences that carry strong intention and are sometimes hidden in plain sight to influence the actions that would benefit our well-being,” said Stephanie Johnson-Toliver, president of the Black Heritage Society of Washington State. “Black people are not strangers to the attempts that are aimed and targeted to divide and harm us. History tells us that through it all, what sets out to destroy and displace us serves to heighten our resolve and fuels our resilient super power to thrive. Recognizing our self-worth is the path to tangible generational wealth.”

For community leaders, controlling the narrative is another form of ownership. It ensures that future generations understand not only where they came from, but also the contributions their communities made to the city around them.

Ed Prince, a longtime Renton City Councilmember and executive director of the Washington State Commission on African American Affairs, believes ownership remains one of the most important challenges facing Black communities throughout the region.

“It’s vitally important to make sure you have what they call that ‘third place’ where people are able to gather and create community,” Prince said. “We need places, even though we’re scattered out, to ensure we stay connected and maintain a true sense of place.”

Prince’s observation underscores a broader truth about spatial justice. Ownership is not solely about property values, development projects or real estate transactions. It is about creating permanent spaces where communities can gather, invest, build relationships and pass opportunities from one generation to the next.

In a rapidly changing Seattle, many Black leaders believe the next chapter of equity will not be measured solely by who has access to opportunity.

It will be measured by who owns a meaningful stake in the future being built.

For advocates of spatial justice, the goal is not simply to be present in Seattle’s future, but to help shape it. Through land ownership, community investment and the preservation of generational wealth, they are pursuing something they believe is essential to lasting equity: the ability to convert community contributions into long-term prosperity and self-determination.

The question is no longer whether Black communities will participate in Seattle’s future.

The question is whether they will own a meaningful share of it.

Hidden Dangers: What You Should Know Before Heading To The Water This Summer

By Aaron Allen, The Seattle Medium

A hot summer day can make Seattle’s lakes, rivers and beaches look inviting, but beneath the surface lurk dangers that claim lives every year.

From 2018 to 2022, King County recorded 135 unintentional drowning deaths, with Lake Washington accounting for nearly 30% of open-water drowning fatalities during that period. The Green and Snoqualmie rivers each accounted for roughly 17% of open-water drowning deaths. Recent county data also found that Black and African American residents experienced drowning rates approximately twice the countywide average.

As families head outdoors this summer, water safety experts say understanding the hidden risks of Pacific Northwest waterways could mean the difference between a day of fun and a preventable tragedy.

According to Public Health – Seattle & King County, preventable drowning deaths have remained at historically high levels in recent years. In 2022, the county recorded 29 preventable drowning deaths, followed by an estimated 30 deaths in 2023, marking the fifth consecutive year of elevated drowning fatalities.

One of the biggest misconceptions about swimming in Washington is that warm weather means warm water.

Cold Water Can Be Dangerous In Minutes

Unlike many parts of the country, Washington’s lakes and rivers remain cold well into the summer because they are fed by mountain snowpack and glacial runoff. Even when air temperatures climb into the 80s, water temperatures can remain dangerously cold.

Water safety experts warn that sudden immersion in cold water can trigger cold-water shock, causing involuntary gasping, rapid breathing and muscle cramps. In severe cases, swimmers can quickly become disoriented or experience hypothermia.

Experts recommend entering the water gradually, especially in lakes and rivers, and immediately exiting if shivering, numbness or cramping begins.

Rivers Often Pose Greater Risks Than Lakes

While many people associate drowning risks with deep water, local rivers can be among the region’s most dangerous recreational areas.

The Green and Snoqualmie rivers were each linked to approximately 17% of open-water drowning fatalities in King County over the past five years.

Fast-moving currents, sudden drop-offs, submerged logs and changing water levels can create dangerous conditions even for experienced swimmers. Water that appears calm on the surface can conceal strong currents beneath.

Water safety officials recommend avoiding solo swims and remaining aware of changing river conditions throughout the day.

Drowning Is Often Silent

Contrary to what many people see in movies and television, drowning victims often cannot call for help.

Many incidents occur quietly and within seconds, particularly involving children.

For that reason, safety experts stress the importance of active supervision. One widely recommended practice is designating a “water watcher,” an adult whose sole responsibility is to monitor swimmers without distractions from phones, books or conversations.

For young children and inexperienced swimmers, adults should remain within arm’s reach whenever they are near the water.

Experts also recommend the use of properly fitted U.S. Coast Guard-approved life jackets for children, inexperienced swimmers and anyone participating in open-water recreation.

Inflatable toys, water wings and pool noodles should never be considered substitutes for approved flotation devices.

A Rescue Attempt Can Create A Second Emergency

One of the most dangerous moments during a water emergency occurs when a friend or family member instinctively jumps in to help.

A panicked swimmer often grabs onto the nearest person, potentially pulling both individuals underwater.

To reduce that risk, aquatic safety professionals teach a simple rule: “Reach or Throw, Don’t Go.”

If someone is struggling in the water, experts recommend extending a long object such as a branch, towel, pole or pool noodle to help pull them to safety. If that is not possible, throw a floating object such as a life jacket or life ring to help keep the person afloat.

Unless properly trained in water rescue techniques, bystanders should avoid entering the water themselves and instead call 911 or alert a nearby lifeguard immediately.

Education Remains The Best Prevention

Public health officials and aquatic safety experts agree that most drowning incidents are preventable.

Swimming lessons, water safety education and emergency preparedness can significantly reduce risks for both children and adults. Local aquatic centers, community organizations and recreation programs throughout the region continue to offer swim instruction and water safety training during the summer months.

For Seattle-area families, enjoying the region’s lakes, rivers and beaches remains one of the great traditions of summer. But experts say the most important thing swimmers can bring to the water isn’t a towel or sunscreen.

It’s awareness.

By understanding the unique dangers of Pacific Northwest waterways and taking a few simple precautions, families can safely enjoy everything the region’s waters have to offer.